






Compliance work hides inside the build. A patient intake form that emails PHI to your front desk just broke the law. A booking widget that syncs to your EHR is an integration, not a plugin. That engineering is why a clinic site lands closer to custom software than a brochure site, and why the price does too.
This page lays out the real ranges: what you pay up front, what drives a quote higher (integrations, intake, accessibility like Ontario's AODA), the monthly costs nobody itemizes, and how long it takes. Fifteen years of building these has taught me where the money actually goes, so you can walk into any quote a sharper buyer. Every number here is an illustrative range, not a quote.Key Takeaways:
Pricing tracks the complexity of what your site has to do, especially around protected health information and integrations. Here is the honest breakdown for custom-built healthcare sites.
| Practice profile | What it includes | Typical range |
|---|---|---|
| Small practice | Compliant contact and intake forms, core service pages, accessible design | $5,000 - $15,000 |
| Growing practice | Online scheduling, multi-provider pages, blog, SEO foundation | $15,000 - $30,000 |
| Mid-size clinic | Patient portal, EHR-adjacent integrations, multi-location, advanced workflows | $30,000 - $60,000 |
Six variables move the number more than anything else. Understanding them lets you control your own budget instead of reacting to a quote.
Each provider needs a bio, credentials, and often their own booking calendar. Each location needs its own hours, address schema, and sometimes its own intake flow. Ten providers across three locations is meaningfully more build than one provider in one office.
If you arrive with finished copy, photos, and provider bios, the project moves fast. If we are writing service pages, gathering credentials, and sourcing photography, that is real work that adds cost. Content is the most common reason a project stalls.
This is the line that separates a $15,000 project from a $50,000 one. Portals involve authentication, data security, and tight integration with clinical systems. They are software, and they are priced like software.
The build is a one-time cost. Running a healthcare site has ongoing costs that cheap proposals conveniently omit. Budget for these so the real total does not surprise you.
Compliant hosting runs higher than standard shared hosting because it must support encryption, access controls, and a signed BAA where PHI is involved. Expect a meaningful monthly line, not the $5/month shared plan a template builder uses.
Email and form handling for anything carrying patient information needs a compliant transactional email service and a form handler that will sign a BAA. Free form plugins almost never qualify.
Privacy-respecting analytics matters here. Standard Google Analytics can be a liability on pages adjacent to health data. For healthcare clients I default to cookieless, privacy-first analytics that avoid consent-banner friction and keep you clear of PHI-tracking risk.
Maintenance and security updates keep the site patched and the integrations working. On custom code this is lighter than the constant plugin-update churn of a template site, but it is never zero.
Timeline tracks scope the same way cost does. These are realistic windows, not best-case fantasies.
A standard practice site - core pages, compliant forms, accessible design, one booking integration - runs 4 to 8 weeks from kickoff to launch. That covers research, design, build, testing across browsers and devices, and staging review.
A complex build - patient portal, multiple integrations, many providers, custom workflows - runs 8 to 12 weeks or more. Portals and EHR-adjacent work need extra testing because the cost of a data-handling bug is not a typo, it is a breach.
The fastest way to compress a timeline is content readiness. Projects that start with finished copy and assets routinely beat the estimate. Projects waiting on the client for bios and photos routinely slip. When you are ready to map your scope to a real timeline, let's talk.Template builders look cheaper on day one. The five-year math tells a different story, especially in healthcare.
A template or page-builder site carries recurring platform fees, premium plugin subscriptions for forms and booking, and constant maintenance as plugins update and break each other. Worse, most off-the-shelf builders will not sign a BAA, which means the "cheap" site is a compliance liability the day you add an intake form.
A custom WordPress alternative built in modern code has a higher upfront cost and a lower carrying cost: no plugin license stack, no monthly builder subscription, faster load times that help SEO, and a tighter security surface. Over three to five years, custom frequently wins on total cost - and it wins decisively on compliance and performance.There is no such thing as a HIPAA-compliant site out of the box. Compliance is a system of safeguards and signed agreements, not a template you buy. Anyone selling "HIPAA-certified" website packages is selling a phrase that does not exist.
Where your money goes matters as much as how much you spend. With a traditional agency, a large share of your budget pays for account managers, project coordinators, and the junior staff who actually touch your project after the senior team wins the pitch.
Working with a solo expert removes that overhead. You talk directly to the person designing and building your site - the one who has seen what works across hundreds of projects and who personally owns the compliance details. No telephone game, no handoff to a junior, no markup on subcontractors.
This is not about being cheaper for its own sake. It is about your budget buying senior craft and direct accountability instead of layers of management. For premium healthcare practices, that direct line to the expert is often the difference between a site that ships correctly and one that needs a rebuild. The recognition behind that work is on the awards page.Pricing means nothing without proof the work performs. Prime Home Health, a Winnipeg home-care clinic operating under Manitoba's PHIA, came in effectively invisible on Google. We did a custom rebuild paired with an SEO retainer.
Every figure below is measured in Google Search Console, not estimated.
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Organic clicks / month | ~4 | 194 |
| Search impressions / month | 433 | 11,400 |
| Indexable pages | under 50 | 303 |
| Terms ranked Page 1 (1,000+ searches/mo) | 0 | 13 |
| New patient inquiries (30 days) | 0 | 20 |
| Figure | Amount |
|---|---|
| Avg revenue / client / month (industry benchmark) | $2,070 |
| Projected monthly revenue (10 new clients) | ~$20,700 |
| Projected first-year value (before renewals) | ~$248,400 |
A fair quote should be specific about deliverables. When pricing a project, here is what should be on the table so you can compare apples to apples.
The cheapest packages are often the most expensive mistake. Here is how to spot a quote that will cost you later.
"HIPAA-compliant out of the box." No site is. Compliance is safeguards plus signed BAAs, configured and maintained. A box you buy is not a system you trust.
No mention of a BAA. If a vendor collecting patient data will not sign a Business Associate Agreement, the site is non-compliant the moment a patient fills out a form. Ask this question first.
An accessibility overlay sold as "ADA/AODA compliant." Overlays do not deliver conformance and have triggered lawsuits. Real accessibility is code-level.
A suspiciously round, suspiciously low flat fee with no discovery about your data, integrations, or providers. Healthcare scope cannot be priced blind. A serious quote follows a conversation about what your site actually handles.
_ This is guidance, not legal advice. Confirm your specific obligations with qualified counsel._
Different practices carry different cost drivers. These pages go deeper on the specifics for your vertical and your jurisdiction.
By compliance regime: HIPAA-compliant website design for US practices, and PHIA and PIPEDA-compliant websites for Canadian providers. HIPAA is US federal law; Canada uses PIPEDA federally plus a provincial health act, and the two are not interchangeable. By practice type: dental, medical clinic, mental health, and telehealth sites each weigh the cost drivers differently.





Partner with an award-winning web designer and web developer from the Philippines, delivering world-class websites to global brands. 15+ years of experience creating sites that convert visitors into customers.
Custom healthcare sites generally run $5,000 to $15,000 for a small practice with compliant forms, $15,000 to $30,000 for a growing practice with scheduling, and $30,000 to $60,000 for a mid-size clinic with a patient portal. The exact figure depends on compliance scope, integrations, and provider count. These are illustrative ranges - we confirm the real number against your scope in discovery.
Because they handle protected health information, which requires encrypted forms, compliant hosting, signed Business Associate Agreements, and code-level accessibility. Those safeguards are real engineering, not optional add-ons. A site that collects patient data is closer to software than to a brochure.
Plan for compliant hosting, a BAA-eligible email and form service, privacy-respecting analytics, and ongoing maintenance and security updates. Custom code keeps maintenance lighter than the plugin churn of template builders, but it is never zero. These running costs are routinely left out of cheap proposals.
A standard practice site runs 4 to 8 weeks. A complex build with a patient portal, multiple integrations, or many providers runs 8 to 12 weeks or more. The biggest accelerator is content readiness - arriving with finished copy, bios, and photos can beat the estimate.
Over three to five years, often yes. Templates carry recurring platform fees, premium plugin subscriptions, and constant maintenance, and most builders will not sign a BAA, making them a compliance liability. Custom code has a higher upfront cost but a lower carrying cost and a far stronger security and performance profile.
No. There is no such thing as a HIPAA-certified or out-of-the-box compliant website. Compliance is a system of safeguards plus signed BAAs that is configured and maintained over time. Any package marketed as "HIPAA-compliant out of the box" is a red flag.
No. HIPAA is US federal law and has no Canadian equivalent. Canada uses PIPEDA federally, layered with a provincial health act - PHIPA in Ontario, PHIA in Manitoba, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland and Labrador, PHIPAA in New Brunswick, and HIA in Alberta. This is informational, not legal advice.
No. Overlays like accessiBe, AudioEye, and UserWay do not deliver conformance and have been named in accessibility lawsuits. In Ontario, AODA requires WCAG 2.0 AA, and real conformance is achieved in the code, not with a bolt-on script.
Your budget buys senior craft and direct accountability instead of account managers and junior handoffs. You work directly with the person designing, building, and owning the compliance details of your site. For healthcare practices, that direct line is often the difference between a site that ships correctly and one that needs a rebuild.
Book a discovery call so we can map your providers, integrations, compliance regime, and content readiness to a real number. Healthcare scope cannot be priced blind, and a serious quote always follows that conversation. You can book a discovery call to get started.